<- Previous Log | Select Different Log | Next Log -> |
Log from 2018-03-30: [04:11:56] *** Quits: G5_ (~g5@p200300EB4BC47D0031C5125D5E7B3BD8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) () [04:31:13] *** Joins: G5 (~g5@p200300EB4BC47D00C8510F307E2C8E0F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) [06:00:11] *** Quits: Lucifer_arma (~quassel@cpe-66-68-59-243.austin.res.rr.com) (Remote host closed the connection) [06:02:13] *** Joins: Lucifer_arma (~quassel@cpe-66-68-59-243.austin.res.rr.com) [08:20:27] <Lucifer_arma> woohoo, I'm back to writing the protocol itself, instead of the code that makes shit get sent [08:56:06] <Lucifer_arma> random question for anybody who knows the answer: does a lock object have to be associated with a specific object for it to work? Or could I, theoretically, create a global lock object and just use that? [12:52:54] *** Quits: Long_Shoota (LS@cpc76132-clif11-2-0-cust623.12-4.cable.virginm.net) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) [12:53:10] *** Joins: Long_Shoota (LS@cpc76132-clif11-2-0-cust623.12-4.cable.virginm.net) [12:57:42] *** Quits: Long_Shoota (LS@cpc76132-clif11-2-0-cust623.12-4.cable.virginm.net) (Read error: No route to host) [12:57:50] *** Joins: Long_Shoota (LS@cpc76132-clif11-2-0-cust623.12-4.cable.virginm.net) [21:45:26] *** Quits: G5 (~g5@p200300EB4BC47D00C8510F307E2C8E0F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) (Ping timeout: 255 seconds) [21:45:31] *** Joins: G5_ (~g5@p200300EB4BCC0B00C0519918B755861F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)View entire month